Joseph H. Kim is a director in Sterne Kessler’s Trial & Appellate Practice Group, where he represents clients in high-stakes intellectual property disputes across the full spectrum of litigation venues. His practice encompasses complex patent litigation in federal district court, at the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC), and before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.

Joe advises and advocates for clients across a broad range of technology sectors, including electronics, communications, construction equipment, consumer products, pharmaceuticals, and medical devices. His litigation experience spans both offensive and defensive postures, and he is particularly skilled at developing coordinated, multi-venue strategies that leverage the interplay between district court proceedings, the ITC, and the PTAB to maximize outcomes for clients. Joe’s experience also includes representing clients in Amazon’s internal patent challenge program, APEX, navigating that forum’s unique procedures to protect and defend client patent portfolios.

Joe’s commitment to his clients extends beyond the walls of the law firm — he has experience working in-house on secondment to develop litigation strategies on the ground, working directly alongside client teams to prepare for district court and ITC litigations. That immersive experience gives Joe a firsthand understanding of the operational pressures and strategic priorities that in-house legal teams face, and informs the practical, business-minded counsel he brings to every engagement.

Prior to joining Sterne Kessler, Joe earned his J.D. from the University of North Carolina School of Law, where he served as Editor-in-Chief of the North Carolina Journal of International Law and was selected as a member of the Davis Society — an honor recognizing eight third-year students for academic distinction and commitment to the law school community. Joe also holds a Master of Science in Mechanical Engineering, with a research focus on high heat-flux microchannel condensation heat transfer, giving him the technical foundation to handle complex patent disputes with depth and precision.

Technical Publications

  • Advantages of Section 337 for Industries Affected by the 271(g) Exemption, 39 337 REP. 72 (2015).
  • Flow Condensation in Parallel Micro-Channels, 55 INT’L J. HEAT & MASS TRANSFER 971 (2012).

  • Catalyst Pharms. Inc. and SERB SA v. Teva Pharms. Inc. et al. (D.N.J.) (counsel for plaintiffs Catalyst and SERB in litigation concerning amifampridine, Firdapse®)
  • Wirtgen America, Inc. v. Caterpillar, Inc. (D. Del.) (counsel for plaintiff Wirtgen in litigation concerning road milling machines)
  • Provisur Techs., Inc. v. Weber, Inc. et al. (W.D. Mo.) (counsel for defendant Weber in litigation concerning commercial food slicing machines)
  • Supernus Pharms., Inc. v. Ajanta Pharma Ltd. et al. (D.N.J.) (counsel for defendant Ajanta in litigation concerning topiramate, Trokendi®)
  • Certain Non-Invasive Aesthetic Body Contouring Devices, Components Thereof & Methods of Using the Same, Inv. No. 337-TA-1219 (ITC) (counsel for complainant BTL Industries in litigation concerning non-invasive magnetic and cryolipolysis aesthetic body-contouring products)
  • Gilead Scis., Inc. v. Apotex, Inc. et al. (D. Del.) (counsel for defendant Hetero in litigation concerning tenofovir alafenamide, Vemlidy®, Descovy®, Odefsey®)
  • Certain Cartridges for Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems & Components Thereof, Inv. No. 337-TA-1141 (ITC) (counsel for complainant JUUL in litigation concerning cartridges for electronic nicotine delivery systems)
  • Certain Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems & Components Thereof, Inv. No. 337-TA-1139 (ITC) (counsel for complainant JUUL in litigation concerning electronic nicotine delivery systems)
  • Certain Road Construction Machines & Components Thereof, Inv. No. 337-TA-1088 (ITC) (counsel for respondents Wirtgen America, Wirtgen GmbH, Wirtgen Group Holding GmbH, Joseph Vogele AG in litigation concerning road construction equipment)
  • Certain Road Milling Machines & Components Thereof, Inv. No. 337-TA-1067 (ITC) (counsel for complainant Wirtgen America in litigation concerning road milling machines)
  • Securus Techs., Inc. v. Global Tel*Link Corp. (N.D. Tex.) (counsel for defendant GTL in litigation concerning specialized telephone call-processing and billing equipment and services)

  • J.D., University of North Carolina School of Law
  • M.S., Mechanical Engineering, Purdue University
  • B.S., Mechanical Engineering, The Johns Hopkins University

  • District of Columbia
  • U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia
  • Virginia

  • Korean

Related News & Insights

From Joseph H. Kim

Articles

April 7, 2026

AI Is Not Your Lawyer: Discovery Risks for Legal and IP Strategy

Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox Kimberlynn “Kimi” R. Seifert, Joseph H. Kim

In the News

September 4, 2025

Federal Circuit Reverses Prosecution Laches in Google v. Sonos

IAM Multiple Authors

U.S. IP Update

August 28, 2025

U.S. IP Update – August 2025

Multiple Authors

U.S. IP Update

July 30, 2025

U.S. IP Update – July 2025

Josephine Kim

Articles

July 21, 2025

Sua Sponte Finding of Invalidity in Sonos v. Google Creates Confusion at Federal Circuit

IAM Paul A. Ainsworth, Joseph H. Kim

U.S. IP Update

June 25, 2025

U.S. IP Update – June 2025

Multiple Authors

U.S. IP Update

May 20, 2025

U.S. IP Update – May 2025

Multiple Authors

U.S. IP Update

April 16, 2025

U.S. IP Update – April 2025

Multiple Authors

Articles

April 10, 2025

U.S. Biotechnology Patent Law – Korean Translation

Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox Joseph H. Kim

Firm News

January 9, 2025

Sterne Kessler Announces Five New Directors in 2025

Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox Multiple Authors

Articles

July 5, 2024

Amazon’s Patent Evaluation Express (APEX) Program Has Declaratory Judgment Action Risks for Patent Owners

The Patent Lawyer Joseph H. Kim, Paul A. Ainsworth

Articles

May 6, 2024

Amazon’s Patent Evaluation Express (APEX) Program Has Declaratory Judgment Action Risks for Patent Owners (May 2024)

Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox Joseph H. Kim, Paul A. Ainsworth

In the News

February 28, 2024

Jury Awards Wirtgen $12.9M Against Caterpillar in Milling Machine Lawsuit

Equipment World Multiple Authors

Firm News

February 27, 2024

Sterne Kessler and Patterson IP Law Team Up to Secure $12.9M Wirtgen Win Over Caterpillar

Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox Multiple Authors

In the News

February 27, 2024

Caterpillar Owes Deere $13 Million in Road-Milling Patent Trial

Bloomberg Law Multiple Authors

In the News

February 26, 2024

Caterpillar to Pay Wirtgen $12.9M in Damages After Patent Battle

Construction Briefing Multiple Authors

In the News

February 26, 2024

Wirtgen Triumphs Over Caterpillar in $12.9 Million Patent Infringement Verdict

BNN Multiple Authors

In the News

February 23, 2024

Deere’s Wirtgen Wins $12.9 mln from Caterpillar in Road-Construction Patent Trial

Reuters Multiple Authors

In the News

September 15, 2022

Novartis Tells FDA Skinny Labels Won’t Work With $3.5B Drug

Law360 Multiple Authors

In the News

September 12, 2022

Gilead Settles Patent Fight With Generic Drugmakers Over HIV Drugs

Reuters Multiple Authors

In the News

September 12, 2022

Gilead Settles HIV Drugs Patent Suit on Eve of Bench Trial

Law360 Multiple Authors

In the News

August 8, 2018

PTAB Rightly Axed Alcon Eye Drop Patent, Fed. Circ. Says

Law360 Multiple Authors

Firm News

August 8, 2018

Sterne Kessler Achieves Affirmance of PTAB Decision at Fed Circuit for Akorn

Multiple Authors

Client Alert

May 25, 2017

The Supreme Court Limits What Constitutes Proper Venue

Multiple Authors

Articles

January 23, 2017

The Return of the ITC as the Forum of Choice

Westlaw Journal Intellectual Property Multiple Authors

Articles

January 11, 2017

The Future of Forum-Shopping in a Post-TC Heartland World

IP Watchdog Byron L. Pickard, Joseph H. Kim