Robert E. Sokohl is a director in Sterne Kessler’s Electronics Practice Group and was a member of the firm’s Executive Committee for nine years. He is a strategic adviser to publicly-traded companies and start-ups. Rob has managed all aspects of these companies IP needs, including extensive experience leading post grant proceedings before the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), such as ex parte reexaminations, inter partes reexaminations and inter partes reviews (IPR), managing patent portfolios that include thousands of assets, preparing patentability, state-of-the-art, infringement and validity opinions, and managing intellectual property due diligence investigations relating to the acquisition of portfolios and/or companies. His practice also includes patent litigation, including matters before federal district courts, the United States International Trade Commission and the Federal Circuit.

Rob was also co-counsel in the seminal 2014 Supreme Court case Alice Corporation Pty Ltd. v CLS Bank International et al., which related to application of the abstract idea exception to computerized business method claims. He was also co-author of the Appellants’ Brief filed in In re Beauregard, 53 F3d 1583, 35 USPQ2d 1383 (Fed. Cir. 1995). This case was brought by IBM to establish that a computer program on a disk was patentable subject matter. It resulted in the USPTO issuing software patent guidelines, which expanded the scope of patent protection for software.

Rob’s litigation experience includes a lead role in representing Jingle in Grape Technology Group, Inc. et al. v. Jingle Networks in the district court where the firm successfully defended Jingle at trial. Rob is actively involved with a number of other litigations at the ITC and District Courts. As part of these efforts, he was intimately involved with the preparation of the claim construction briefs, summary judgment briefs, as well as all aspects of discovery for the defendants.

Rob earned his J.D. from American University Washington College of Law and his B.S. in computer engineering from Syracuse University (which is why his favorite color is orange).

Mr. Sokohl has significant litigation experience, particularly in defending clients in intellectual property disputes:

  • Grape Technology Inc. et al. v. Jingle Networks, Inc.
  • decisioning.com v. TD Ameritrade
  • Toy v. TD Ameritrade
  • Supracor v. Reebok
  • Janigian v. Group 1 Software

  • IAM Patent 1000, “Washington, DC: Recommended – Transactions, Patent Prosecution; Patent Litigation (Bronze Band)” (2023 – 2014)
  • The Legal 500, “Highly Recommended Lawyer – Patent Prosecution (including reexamination and post-grant proceedings)” (2018 – 2017)

  • J.D., American University Washington College of Law
  • B.S., Computer Engineering, Syracuse University

  • District of Columbia
  • United States Patent & Trademark Office

Related Resources

From Robert E. Sokohl

In the News

October 3, 2022

High Court Again Asks for SG's Views on Patent Eligibility

Law360

In the News

July 25, 2022

Breaking: USPTO To Revisit 101 Guidance

Managing IP

In the News

January 28, 2022

PTAB Clears Nasdaq To Seek Director Review of Axed IP

Law360

In the News

April 9, 2021

Take-Two Loses Bid for Tribunal Review of Video Game Patents

Bloomberg Law

Press Release

June 16, 2020

Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox and 15 Directors Earn Top Rankings in IAM Patent 1000

Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.

In the News

April 23, 2020

Remote Court Arguments Pose Challenges, New Routines for Lawyers

Bloomberg Law

In the News

January 27, 2020

Justices Reject 3 More Cases Challenging Alice

Law360

In the News

January 9, 2020

'Indefensible' Patent Eligibility Rule Must Go, Justices Told

Law360

In the News

December 20, 2019

SG Tells Justices To Skip 'Unsuitable' Abstract Patent Appeal

Law360

In the News

December 3, 2019

Google Wins PTAB Challenge To Communications Patent

Law360

In the News

November 20, 2019

Google Gets Messaging Patent Trimmed At PTAB

Law360

In the News

September 16, 2019

Invalidating Abstract Patents Isn't Working, Justices Told

Law360

In the News

July 30, 2019

IBG, Broker Ask High Court To Clarify 'Confusing' CBM Rules

Law360

In the News

July 1, 2019

Fed. Circ. Lets Alice Invalidate Another Trading Tech Patent

Law360

Press Release

June 12, 2019

Sterne Kessler Prominent Again in Intellectual Asset Management Magazine’s "IAM Patent 1000"

Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C

In the News

May 14, 2019

Fed. Circ. Axes 4 More Trading Tech Patents Under Alice

Law360

In the News

April 30, 2019

Fed. Circ. Nixes Another Trading Tech Patent As Abstract

Law360

In the News

April 18, 2019

Fed. Circ. Won't Revive Alice-Axed Trading Tech Patents

Law360