When the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approves a new drug, it also approves a package insert of the drug, known as a “product label.” A pharmaceutical company marketing a generic product (i.e., a generic or biosimilar pharmaceutical company) is required to package its product with a product label. The generic product label is required to be substantially similar to the brand product label.
Litigation involving pharmaceutical-related patents typically occurs prior to the launch of a generic or biosimilar product. So infringement by the generic or biosimilar pharmaceutical company is based upon the product or product label proposed to the FDA to be approved.
A generic or biosimilar pharmaceutical company rarely performs a step recited in a method of use patent, such as “treating a patient.” Therefore, to establish patent infringement, a patentee must demonstrate the generic pharmaceutical company induces a third party (e.g., the doctor or patient) to perform a claimed method, such as “treating a patient.”
Overview of Inducement as Applied in the Pharmaceutical Context
- A party “causes, urges, encourages, or aids” a direct infringement by another party.
- It must establish that the alleged infringer (e.g., a generic or biosimilar pharmaceutical company) knowingly induces infringement and has a specific intent to encourage the third party to infringe the patent.
- A generic or biosimilar pharmaceutical company has no intent to induce infringing use if the product label does not instruct a third party to use the product in an infringing manner.
What Constitutes an “Instruction for Use” in an Infringing Manner in the Product Label?
- It is not sufficient that the product label describes an infringing mode. The label must “recommend,” “encourage,” or “promote” the infringing use.
- Vague label language cannot be combined with speculation about how physicians may act.
Prosecution Strategies Regarding the Product Label
- If possible, draft claims with the exact language included in the “Indications and Usage” and/or “Dosage and Administration” sections of the product label.
- Draft claims to match “warnings” included in the product label.
- Draft claims directed to new indications and patient subpopulations, especially if there is a difference in efficacy in a particular patient subpopulation.
- Draft claims directed to combination therapies, especially if the combination impacts the safety and efficacy of the original patient population.
- Draft claims with claims directed to the pharmacokinetic parameters (e.g., Cmax, Tmax, and AUC) included on the product label.
- If you must prosecute mechanism of action claims, try to tie the mechanism of action to the approved indication.
- Draft claims with divided infringement defense in mind. All steps must be performed by a single party or under the direction of that party.
This article appeared in the 2025 Life Sciences IP Tool Kit.
Related Industries
Related Services
Receive insights from the most respected practitioners of IP law, straight to your inbox.
Subscribe for Updates